Volcker rule trading account test
Unlike the SEC Regulation M definition of distribution governing purchases and offers to purchase during a distribution and market stabilization , the definition used in the Volcker Rule excludes the magnitude of the offering as a relevant factor. Engaging in the following activities may indicate that a banking entity is acting as an underwriter as part of a distribution of securities:.
Thus, this exemption will potentially affect local underwriting practices of banking entities on a worldwide basis unless, instead, the foreign banking exemption, discussed above, can be utilized.
It will also apply to Rule A transactions not conducted on a riskless principal basis. For firms that effect a foreign public offering in conjunction with a U.
If this is the case, then foreign underwriting practices would not be affected by the limitations in the underwriting exemption. This position is consistent with the non-integration of these offerings for U. However, it remains uncertain whether dually-registered personnel of these distinct entities located outside of the United States , acting in distinct capacities, can be used in both distributions. These matters will need to be clarified with the staff of the functional regulators.
This position may potentially apply in the case of offerings using the Canada-U. If these offerings can be viewed as distinct, separate exemptions could also be utilized. However, in many of these cases, dually registered personnel are utilized, so clarification concerning this issue will be needed. Since such compensation arrangements are common in Canadian and other foreign investment banking transactions, the foreign banking exemption may instead be useful in this context with the foreign investment banking affiliate exclusively receiving such compensation.
Such compensation could be received for the investment account of a U. As noted above, another exemption from the ban on proprietary trading was created for market-making related activities.
Market making-related activities are exempted from the proprietary trading ban if:. Under this exemption, affiliated broker-dealers would need to be approved by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. In addition to being appropriately registered in this manner, the broker-dealer would need to demonstrate consistency and substantial market-making activity, whether effected on an exchange, alternative trading systems or in other over-the-counter markets, either domestically or in foreign markets, in order to rely on this exemption.
Thus, practices such as withdrawing from market making during periods of market stress or auto-quoting away from the market may disqualify a firm from relying on the exemption if not combined with robust bona fide market-making activities.
The prohibition on proprietary trading also exempts risk-mitigating hedging activities. These activities are permitted in connection with, and related to, individual or aggregated positions, contracts, or other holdings of the banking entity that are designed to reduce the specific risks to the banking entity in such connection.
Risk-mitigating hedging activities of a banking entity are permitted if the following conditions are met:. As noted above, the determination of whether an activity or strategy is risk-reducing or mitigating must be made at the inception of the hedging activity.
Notwithstanding the exemptions from the proprietary trading ban described above, transactions will be deemed to be impermissible if they:. However, the amount of capital at risk in a transaction, whether or not the transaction can be hedged, the amount of leverage present in the transaction and the general financial condition of the banking entity engaging in the transaction, should be considered. A similar interest consists of an interest:. Ownership Interest expressly excludes performance compensation to investment managers and other service providers to the covered fund and their employees or former employees, provided that any holdback is used solely for the purpose of satisfying contractual claw back rights and the holdback reserve does not share in subsequent performance.
Such interests must generally be non-transferrable, except to affiliates, immediate family members or in connection with the sale of the business to an unaffiliated entity that provides such services.
The Volcker Rule also expressly provides that certain activities are permitted notwithstanding the general prohibition. A banking entity is permitted to make initial investments in a covered fund that it sponsors, including acting as the governing body for such entity, if:.
The final rule imposes per Fund and aggregate de minimis limits on banking entity investments in covered funds. For fund of funds structures, compliance is measured only with regard to master funds and not individual feeder funds. The greater of the amount contributed to covered funds and the fair market value of such interests must be deducted from Tier 1 Capital. An exemption similar to the exemption for permitted risk-mitigating hedging activities in the proprietary trading prohibition is also provided for permitted covered fund activities.
Foreign banking organizations are not subject to the prohibitions on covered fund activities if the following among other requirements are satisfied:. An activity or investment occurs solely outside of the United States if: Thus, considerably more flexibility is provided to foreign banking organizations, through reliance on a combination of the seeding period exemption and the foreign covered fund activity exemption, than is provided to U.
In this way, the relationship between a banking entity and a covered fund is subject to the same prohibitions on affiliated transactions as are non-covered fund affiliates of a U.
All such transactions are required to be entered into on terms that are comparable to those entered into with unaffiliated entities.
If a banking entity enters into a prime brokerage transaction with a covered fund, the chief executive officer of the banking entity must certify annually with a duty to update that the banking entity does not, directly or indirectly guarantee, assume or otherwise insure the obligations or performance of the covered funds or of any covered fund in which it invests.
Banking entities that do not engage in any Volcker Rule covered activities are not required to establish a Volcker Rule compliance program.
For foreign banking entities, it is sufficient if the U. Banking entities that are engaged in significant trading must furnish periodic reports to their primary regulatory agencies on a range of quantitative measurements regarding their proprietary trading.
Beginning on June 30, , any U. Foreign banking entities with trading assets and liabilities of the combined U. Any banking entity subject to these reporting requirements must create and retain records documenting the preparation and content of each report, as well as the information necessary to permit a regulator to verify the accuracy of such information in the report for a period of five years.
Online services, resources, and tools Technical resources Stay connected. Scott Publication March Introduction On December 10, , the U. As used in the Volcker Rule, financial instruments consist of the following: Foreign Sovereign Debt Exemption The proprietary trading prohibition does not apply to financial instruments that are sovereign debt obligations including debt obligations of multinational central banks, such as the European Central Bank, of which the foreign sovereign is a member , including obligations of agencies and political subdivisions of that sovereign, in cases in which: The foreign banking exemption is applicable to the purchase and sale of any financial instrument if: The banking entity is not organized or directly or indirectly controlled by a banking entity organized in the United States; The foreign banking organization e.
This will impose a human resources constraint on foreign banking entities since personnel will need to be based outside of the United States even if U. As noted above, the Volcker Rule added two additional exemptions for transactions by a foreign bank with unaffiliated market intermediaries such as unaffiliated registered broker-dealers , thus preserving the prohibition on entering into a proprietary trading transaction with an affiliated U.
If the market intermediary is acting as agent, then the transaction also must be conducted anonymously on an exchange or trading facility. The Agencies have acknowledged that an anonymous trade could result in a transaction between a foreign bank and its U. Nevertheless, many foreign banking entities will need to reorganize their methods of executing transactions in U.
Thus, foreign entities are substantially denied the benefits of having an affiliated U. Exemptions for Permitted Investments in Covered Funds Notwithstanding the Rule's prohibitions on acquiring and retaining ownership interests in covered funds, a banking entity may acquire and retain such ownership interests in a covered fund for the purpose of either i establishing the fund and providing the fund with sufficient initial equity for investment to permit the fund to attract unaffiliated investors or ii making de minimis investments.
Each of these activities is subject to limitations. As noted above, ownership interests in connection with underwriting and market-making activities are included in these calculations. Although the per fund and aggregate limits apply to the aggregate holdings of the banking entities and their affiliates, the Rule excludes from the determination of holdings the holdings of certain registered investment companies, business development companies and foreign public funds which might be considered affiliates of the banking entity.
Exemptions for Permitted Risk-Mitigating Hedging Activities The Rule provides a very narrow exemption for investments in a covered fund which reduce risk to the banking entity arising from an employee compensation arrangement that is tied to the performance of the covered fund.
The hedging activity must demonstrably reduce or significantly mitigate one or more specific risks arising in connection with the compensation arrangement with an employee who directly provides investment advisory, commodity trading advisory or other services to the covered fund.
The investment may not give rise to any significant new or additional risk which is not itself contemporaneously hedged. The Rule also requires the banking entity to implement and enforce an internal compliance program that includes reasonably designed policies and procedures, internal controls and ongoing monitoring, management and authorization procedures. In addition, the compensation arrangement to which the hedge relates must provide that any losses incurred by the banking entity on the hedge be offset by a reduction in the amounts payable to the employee.
Exemptions for Certain Permitted Covered Fund Activities and Investments Outside of the United States A banking entity may acquire or retain an ownership interest in, or sponsor, a covered fund if: Exemptions for Permitted Covered Fund Interests and Activities by a Regulated Insurance Company An insurance company may acquire or retain an ownership interest in, or sponsor, a covered fund if: Limitations on Relationships with a Covered Fund Generally, no banking entity that serves as the investment manager, investment adviser, commodity trading advisor or sponsor to a covered fund, that organizes and offers a covered fund as permitted by the Rule or that continues to hold an ownership interest as permitted by the Rule, may enter into a transaction with the covered fund that would be a covered transaction 22 under Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act, assuming that the banking entity were a member bank and the covered fund were an affiliate.
However, the Rule provides exceptions for the acquisition and retention of ownership interests as permitted by the Rule and also for certain prime brokerage transactions. A banking entity which serves as the investment manager, investment adviser, commodity trading advisor or sponsor to a covered fund must comply with the restrictions on transactions between member banks and affiliates imposed under 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, assuming that the banking entity were a member bank and the covered fund were an affiliate.
In this context, a banking entity can mitigate a conflict of interest, and proceed with the transaction, through timely and effective disclosure of the conflict, or through established, adequate information barriers.
Compliance Each banking entity is required to develop a program reasonably designed to ensure and monitor compliance with the prohibitions on proprietary trading and covered fund activities and investments. The terms, scope, and detail of the compliance program must be appropriate for the type, size, scope, and complexity of activities and business structure of the entity. The minimum requirements for all banking entities include:. Certain large banking entities 24 engaged in proprietary trading are subject to "enhanced compliance" requirements.
These entities are required to establish, maintain, and enforce a governance and management framework that is reasonably designed to ensure that appropriate personnel are responsible and accountable for the effective implementation and enforcement of the compliance program, a clear reporting line with a chain of responsibility, and the periodic review of the compliance program by senior management.
A significantly broader group 25 of banking entities engaged in proprietary trading will be required to report quantitative metrics on their trading activities. Effective Date and Compliance Dates The Rule became effective April 1, , but affected banking organizations generally will have until July 21, to bring their proprietary trading and private fund activities into conformance with the Rule.
This new conformance date is an administrative extension of the original statutory conformance date of July 21, Also, the deadline for conformance by banking entities in connection with loan securitizations will be extended to July 21, with regard to their ownership interests in, and sponsorship of, any loan securitizations that had been in place as of December 31, An important exception to the extension is that banking organizations with significant trading activities will be required to report quantitative metrics on their trading activities beginning in July In addition, banking organizations are expected to engage in "good faith efforts" to bring all of their covered activities into compliance by the July conformance date.
To this end, the Federal Reserve Board has warned that "banking entities should not expand activities and make investments during the conformance period with an expectation that additional time to conform those activities or investments will be granted. Critics of the Rule foresaw a reduction in the efficiency of markets, economic growth and employment as a result of loss of liquidity.
Further negative forecasts included high transition costs as non-banking entities assumed trading activities currently performed by banking entities, a reduction in commercial output and resource exploration due to a lack of hedging counterparties, and reduced access to debt markets.
Supporters of the Rule emphasized that restrictions in proprietary trading may reduce systemic risk and lower the probability of another financial crisis. The regulators contend that the Rule as promulgated achieves a balance between promoting healthy economic activity and reducing regulatory burdens where appropriate.
Time will tell whether the right balance has been achieved. This article summarizes in broad outline the principal provisions of the Volcker Rule. The Rule itself is heavily detailed and qualified, and has been nuanced by substantial commentary submitted by the regulatory agencies responsible for the Rule.
Application of the Rule to specific circumstances will require a review of pertinent provisions of the Rule in greater detail than that present in this article. There are exclusions for "covered funds" as hereinafter defined and certain portfolio companies and portfolio concerns which might be considered affiliates or subsidiaries of banking entities in any of the first three categories above. There is also an exclusion for the FDIC acting in its corporate capacity or as a conservator or receiver for a banking entity.
Ownership interests may not be "predominantly owned" by the banking entity or the issuer or their respective affiliates, directors and employees.
A loan securitization generally may not include securities.